BBC Learnings · Section 1
Are opinion polls accurate_
Hello, this is 6 Minute English from BBC Learning English. I'm Neil. And I'm Sam.
Level: B1 · 53 sentences
Transcript
- Hello, this is 6 Minute English from BBC Learning English.
- I'm Neil. And I'm Sam.
- Predicting the future is not easy, but that's exactly the job of opinion pollsters – researchers who ask people questions to discover what they think about certain topics.
- Often their aim is predicting which political party will win in an election by asking members of the public how they intend to vote.
- But predicting the future is never 100% accurate and opinion polls don't always get it right.
- In 2016, few pollsters predicted a victory for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton in the US presidential election.
- And in the 2020 US elections, most polls predicted Trump would lose to Joe Biden by a much larger amount than he actually did.
- These mistakes, sometimes called misfires, when things do not work in the way intended, have damaged the reputation of opinion pollsters.
- In this program, we'll be taking a look into the opinion polling industry and, of course, learning some useful vocabulary as well.
- But first I have a question for you, Sam, and it's about another time when the opinion polls got it wrong.
- Few pollsters predicted that Britain would vote to leave the European Union in the 2016 Brexit referendum, which, in the end, it did.
- But what was the final split between those who voted to leave and those who wanted to remain?
- Was it a 51 leave to 49 remain b 52 leave to 48 remain Or c.
- 52 remain to 48 leave?
- I think it was b.
- 52% voted to leave and 48% to remain.
- OK, Sam, I'll reveal the answer at the end of the programme.
- One of the biggest polling companies was founded by George Gallop.
- Born in 1901 on a farm in Iowa, Gallop was a student of journalism.
- He wanted to know people's opinion on a range of subjects and came up with a simple idea.
- Why not try asking them?
- Here's G. Elliott Morris, a data journalist from The Economist, explaining more to BBC World Service programme, more or less.
- And he publishes his dissertation on this, how to measure what people want, basically.
- And he gets hired by a much bigger advertising agency in New York called Young and Rubicam.
- And they basically give him a blank check to do their research, to figure out how to call people, how to talk to them, to figure out if they...
- remember or liked a certain product, basically to figure out early methodologies in advertising.
- And then by 1931 or so, he's wondering, well, if it works for toothpaste, why not politics?
- George Gallop tried to figure out what customers wanted to buy.
- If you figure something out, you finally understand it or find a solution to a problem after thinking about it a lot.
- Later he was hired by a New York advertising agency to find out people's opinion of consumer products like toothpaste and soft drinks.
- George was given a blank cheque and a limited amount of money and freedom to do his job.
- At this time, polling was focused on consumer preferences, not politics.
- But asking people about their political views is a lot more complicated than asking them about toothpaste.
- Making accurate election predictions depends on polling a sample group of people who accurately represent the population as a whole.
- One of the reasons for pollsters' failure to predict Trump's election in 2016 is that they didn't ask enough white, non-college educated voters.
- So polling is a very complex process, one which is never totally reliable, according to G Elliot Morris, speaking again here to BBC World Service's More or Less.
- If people were understanding this process that's generating all these polls, then they would understand polls as less sort of precise tools, tools that definitely can't offer the laser-like predictive accuracy we've come to expect from them.
- Then the difference between polling's expectations and performance wouldn't be so stark.
- Opinion polls can estimate the outcome of an election, but they can't give us laser-like accuracy.
- If you describe something as laser-like, you mean it's very accurate and focused, like a laser.
- If people understand how hard it is to predict the future, they might be more realistic about how accurate opinion polls can be.
- Then, differences between a prediction and the final result wouldn't be so stark, obvious and easily visible or harsh.
- Predicting the future is difficult, otherwise everyone would be a lottery winner by now.
- Maybe it's not opinion polls that are broken, but our desire to know the future that's the problem.
- OK, it's time to reveal the answer to my question about the Brexit referendum.
- I said the final result was 52% for leave and 48% for remain.
- Which was the correct answer and another example of an opinion poll misfire – a situation where something does not work as intended.
- OK, let's recap the rest of the vocabulary from this programme about opinion pollsters – people who conduct polls asking the public their opinion on particular subjects, especially politics.
- If you figure something out, you finally understand it or find the solution to a problem after thinking long and hard about it.
- If someone gives you a blank cheque, you have unlimited money and freedom to complete a task.
- When you describe something as laser-like… You mean that it's very accurate and precise.
- And finally, the adjective stark has several meanings, including obvious, harsh and plain.
- Once again, our six minutes are up. Bye for now. Bye-bye.