BBC Learnings · Section 11
Did a civilisation exist on Earth before humans_
Hello, this is 6 Minute English from BBC Learning English. I'm Beth. And I'm Phil.
Level: B1 · 59 sentences
Transcript
- Hello, this is 6 Minute English from BBC Learning English.
- I'm Beth. And I'm Phil.
- Phil, do you believe there's life on other planets?
- Well, there's a lot of other planets, so yeah, I think there must be.
- Yeah, I agree. Well, it's a question that interests American astrophysicist Adam Frank, who discussed it with his colleague Gavin Schmidt, director of NASA's Institute for Space Studies.
- Here, Adam recalls their conversation for BBC World Service programme CrowdScience.
- We know that there's been no other civilisation on Earth, and he stopped at me and said, how do you know that?
- And my jaw just dropped down to the floor.
- Adam's jaw dropped. An idiom for when someone looks shocked and surprised.
- Could there have been a technologically advanced civilisation before us here on Earth?
- It may sound weird, but this idea has a scientific name.
- Here is Caroline Steele, presenter of BBC's CrowdScience, to explain.
- The Silurian hypothesis proposes that if there was a technologically advanced civilisation hundreds of millions of years ago, we wouldn't be able to find traces of it.
- A hypothesis is an idea which explains how something happens and can be tested to find out if it's correct.
- In this episode, we'll be discussing the Silurian hypothesis, the idea that a technologically advanced civilisation existed before us on Earth but vanished without leaving a trace.
- As usual, we'll be learning some useful new words and idioms, and remember, you'll find all the vocabulary on our website.
- bbclearningenglish.com. But first, I have a question for you, Phil.
- Human civilisation is thousands of years old, but the planet itself is much older.
- So how old do scientists think the Earth is?
- Is it a. 3.5 billion years, b.
- 4.5 billion years or c.
- 5.5 billion years? I'm going to guess c.
- Five and a half billion years.
- OK, well, we will find the answer out later in the programme.
- To believe a technologically advanced civilisation existed on Earth hundreds of millions of years ago, most people would probably want evidence.
- We have evidence about other species from the past, such as the dinosaurs from fossils.
- the remains of prehistoric plants or animals that have been preserved in rock for a very long time.
- But according to Adam Frank, fossils won't help prove the Silurian hypothesis, as he explains here to BBC World Service programme CrowdScience.
- Most things are not fossilised.
- It's only a tiny fraction of Earth's life that has ever become fossilised.
- So imagine that you have a 10,000-year-long civilisation...
- which is a blink of the eye for geology, that's too short to really create a lot of fossils.
- Adam argues that only a tiny fraction, meaning a very small amount, of life on Earth has turned into fossil.
- In geological time, even a 10,000-year-old civilisation is the blink of an eye, an idiom meaning a very short period of time.
- In other words, older civilisations might have existed on Earth, but not for long enough to leave fossilised evidence.
- However, not everyone is convinced by Adam's ideas.
- Evidence of our own civilisation, including plastics and man-made materials like concrete, is already being layered into the Earth's crust, and these are going to last a very long time.
- So surely a technologically advanced civilisation from prehistory would have left similar marks?
- Well, here's Adam Frank again answering these objections on BBC World Service programme CrowdScience.
- What happens is somebody else will pick up on their work, either affirming it and showing new evidence for it or pushing back on it.
- And once you get to like...
- 20, 30, 40 papers, then you have a consensus.
- You're like, OK, we've really, really looked at this, and now we don't.
- Adam welcomes new evidence, even evidence which contradicts his ideas, as part of the scientific method needed to prove a hypothesis right or wrong.
- It's how scientists form a consensus, meaning a general agreement about the issue.
- Personally, I think the idea of prehistoric civilisations on Earth is so mysterious, It's OK to keep an open mind.
- Now, isn't it time you revealed the answer to your question, Beth?
- I think it is. I asked you, how old do scientists think the Earth is?
- You said five and a half billion years and I'm afraid you were wrong, Phil.
- It's four and a half billion years.
- OK, let's recap the vocabulary we've learnt, starting with the idiom, my jaw dropped, which is used to say someone looks very shocked and surprised.
- A hypothesis is a suggestion that's proposed to explain something which can then be tested to see if it's true.
- Fossils are the remains of prehistoric plants or animals that have been preserved in rock for a very long time.
- A tiny fraction of something is a very small amount of it.
- The idiom the blink of an eye means a very short period of time.
- And finally, a consensus is a general agreement.
- Once again, our six minutes are up.
- But if you're keen for more, then head over to our website, bbclearningenglish.com, where you'll find a worksheet and a quiz for this episode.
- See you again soon. But for now, it's goodbye. Goodbye.