BBC Learnings · Section 19
Ecotourism good or bad
I'm Neil. And I'm Beth.
Level: B2 · 63 sentences
Transcript
- I'm Neil.
- And I'm Beth.
- Nowadays, the word safari is often used negatively.
- For many people, the idea of killing animals for sport is unacceptable.
- As the popularity of hunting declines… Safaris are swapping their guns for cameras, offering tourists the chance to photograph wild animals in their natural habitat.
- In recent years, nature and wildlife tourism, also called ecotourism, has grown massively.
- But the story is complex.
- While money from ecotourism is supposed to support threatened wildlife and traditional local cultures, the reality is sometimes different.
- In this programme, we'll be asking… is ecotourism good or bad?
- And as usual, we'll be learning some useful new vocabulary as well.
- But first I have a question for you, Beth.
- Most tourists on safari are looking for the Big Five, the name given to Africa's most iconic large animals.
- But which animals are the Big Five?
- A. The lion, leopard, giraffe, baboon and buffalo.
- B. The lion, leopard, tiger, elephant and buffalo.
- Or C. The lion, leopard, rhinoceros, elephant and buffalo?
- I guess it's a.
- The lion, leopard, giraffe, baboon and buffalo.
- I'll reveal the answer at the end of the programme.
- The balance between the good and bad things ecotourism can bring is well understood by Vicky Smith, whose website Earth Changes matches ecotourists with environmentally friendly travel companies.
- Here's Vicky talking with BBC Radio 4 programme Costing the Earth.
- Just because tourism is nature-based, it doesn't mean to say it's necessarily responsible or sustainable.
- So there's a lot of animal activities in tourism that we know which are highly irresponsible and unsustainable,
- Like performing whale and dolphin shows or swimming with dolphins, elephant riding, tiger selfies where the tigers are drugged.
- Genuine ecotourism is sustainable.
- Designed to continue at a steady level which does not damage the environment.
- Not every travel company which calls themselves eco-friendly acts sustainably and may still advertise irresponsible tourist activities, including tiger selfies, having your photo taken with a captive wild tiger.
- There are two requirements travel companies should meet to qualify as genuine ecotourism.
- First, tourists' main motivation – should be to appreciate and observe the natural world without interfering.
- And second, the money they spend should support traditional communities.
- Clearly, having your photograph taken with a chained and drugged tiger does not meet these requirements.
- But not all companies claiming to be ecotourism behave so irresponsibly.
- According to Antonia Bolingbroke-Kent, who runs small-scale wildlife expeditions to some of the most remote places on Earth,
- It's possible to put travel companies on a sliding scale from good to bad.
- On BBC Radio 4's programme Costing the Earth, Antonia discussed her work in Tajikistan, a country where ecotourism is making a positive impact on both animal and human communities.
- At the other end of the scale is Tajikistan, where I work a lot, which gets less than two dozen wildlife tourists a year.
- And the money these visitors bring is essential to the conservation work that grassroots NGOs are doing.
- So those few tourists, their money goes a very long way.
- And the animals people are looking at, snow leopards, rare mountain ungulates like Bukharan Markor, they are being observed from a distance.
- Their behaviour is not being affected in any way.
- And the local communities are genuinely benefiting.
- Antonia uses the phrase at the other end of the scale as a way of contrasting irresponsible tourist companies with what's happening in Tajikistan.
- There, animals including snow leopards and mountain ungulates are being protected by ecotourist projects run by non-governmental organisations or NGOs,
- Organisations trying to achieve environmental or social aims outside of government control.
- These NGOs are grassroots organisations, meaning that they are run from the bottom up by ordinary people rather than leaders.
- Despite getting very few ecotourists a year, the money they spend in Tajikistan goes a long way.
- In other words, the money is an important factor in achieving their goals, which in Tajikistan at least...
- Means protecting rare wild animals.
- OK, it's time to reveal the answer to my question.
- You asked me about the Big Five, the name for Africa's iconic safari animals.
- I guessed they were the lion, leopard, giraffe, baboon and buffalo.
- You guessed right about the lion, leopard and buffalo, but the others were the rhinoceros and the elephant.
- OK, let's recap the vocabulary we've learned from this programme about ecotourism.
- Travel to places of natural beauty where the tourist's motivation is to appreciate nature and support the local culture.
- The adjective sustainable describes actions designed to continue at a steady level so as not to damage the environment.
- A tiger selfie means having your photo taken with a captive wild tiger.
- Not something to be advised.
- The phrase at the other end of the scale is similar in meaning to the phrase by contrast.
- A grassroots NGO is a non-governmental organisation which tries to achieve its aims through the actions of local, ordinary people rather than leaders.
- And finally, if something goes a long way towards a certain goal, it's an important factor in achieving that goal.
- Once again, our six minutes are up.
- Goodbye for now.
- Bye.